Saturday, March 21, 2026

Yet another Blast from the Past...

 I suppose just about everyone and his dog has played the Charge! "Battle of Blasthof Bridge" at least once in their lives. The last time I played it, a zillion years back, the Electoral Army maintained its tradition of victory. I was commanding, of course, the Imperialists.



But, back in January, methought to play a Portable Wargames version on a square gridded table. I had completely forgotten about this action, to be reminded this evening by a posting in the Librarian Wargamer blogspot.

This battle used my Warlord figures, my Army of Prinz Eugene of Savoy, split to represent the Imperialists against their inveterate foes of the Electorate. For this action I rather formalised the ORBATs into 6-figure squadrons, 8-figure companies and 2-gun batteries.

The action purported to be an opening clash between the advanced guards of the respective armies approaching an important bridge crossing the river that separated the Empire from the Electorate. Both sides mobilising with equal celerity, the leading forces were soon on the march. The honour of leading the Imperial advanced guard the Emperor bestowed upon the redoubtable cavalryman, Graf Eusebius von Kornstartsch, renowned more for dash and daring than for strategic sagacity. On the Electoral side, an obscure and self-effacing General Charlot Soubise found himself in command of the leading corps, and wondering why he was so appointed. It was later given out that perhaps a staff error, possibly due to a secretary's atrocious handwriting, had substituted the relatively unknown provincial commandant for the more experienced and better known Prince Charles de Soubise for the important command.

Be that as it may, both commanders realised as they approached the objective of their marches that to gain possession of the vital crossing, they would have to fight for it. 

The respective commands comprised:

Teutoberg-Althaufen:

Commander: General Charlot Soubise 
His Aide-de-camp
Weltschmerz Infantry: 4 companies @ 4SP + Rgt HQ (36 figures)
Schadenfreude Infantry: 4 companies @ 4SP + Rgt HQ (36 figures)
Gens d'Armes Cuirassiers: 3 squadrons @ 3SP (18 figures)
Royal la Marine Artillery: 2 guns each with 4 crew   @ 4SP (8 figures)

Totals: 
72 foot, 18 horse, 8 artillery, 2 HQ staff = 100 figures
13 units (counting the Army HQ as one), activations according to dice rolls range from 5 up to 9.
49 Strength Points, exhausted on -17; rout on -25.

Imperial:

Commander: Marschallgeneral Graf Eusebius von Kornstartsch
His aide-de-camp
Grenadiers Guggenheim: 2 companies @ 5SP + Rgt HQ (18 figures)
Fusiliers Finckenstein: 4 companies @ 4SP + Rgt HQ (36 figures)
Kornstartch Cuirassiers: 3 squadrons @ 3SP (18 figures) 
Dromgoole Dragoons: 2 squadrons @ 3SP (12 figures)
Schnitzel Artillery: 1 company of 2 guns @ 4SP (8 figures)

Totals:
54 foot, 30 horse, 8 artillery, 2 HQ staff = 94 figures
13 units, activations range from 5 to 9.
49 Strength Points, exhausted on -17, rout on -25.

Note that the two companies of grenadiers were allocated 5SPs, partly to denote their elite status, but mainly to make up a slight deficit in the SP count compared with the Electoral army.


The Narrative...


Imperial Cuirassiers begin crossing the river, whilst 
the guns open fire, enfilading the enemy infantry fording the stream




Two squadrons crossing, whilst the third waits...


Plenty for the Electoral guns to shoot at!

Elector gained the initiative, but both sides
eager for the fray (the 6s).

...
View from behind Electoral lines. One regiment, with a 
squadron in support, hopes by crossing the river early, to outflank
the bridge position on the far bank.

From behind Imperial lines. The cuirassiers are just following
tradition, really. But they may be able to flank the electoral infantry lining the 
west bank




General electoral advance, whilst the guns roar.

Superb shooting by the Imperial guns.
An electoral infantry company is taking some stick!

Electoral guns proving with this salvo, far less effective!

The inspiration of it all. Fearful execution by the 
right hand Imperial artillery section.



Now, at least some of the Electoral guns 
do damage. Nr 3 Coy of the Finckenstein 
Fusiliers takes a heavy knock

Cavalry fight on the Electoral side of the river, but they have 
only 2 squadrons available against 3.



As the Electoral horse charged, for the moment it is 
2 Squadrons against 2, and they are getting something
the better of the fight...

... but once the 3rd Imperial squadron joins in,
the writing is on the wall.


Musketry duel between Fusilier 3rd Company, and the 
leading company of Weltschmerz Infantry.

Droomgoole Dragoons catch two companies of 
Schadenfreude Infantry in the plough.

The end of the cavalry fight. Both sides have lost 
4 strength points, but 2nd Sqn, Gens d'Armes, has 
been destroyed.

General view. The Grenadiers lie in wait for the enemy
infantry company wading through the river.

Crisis! As the last of Schadenfreude Infantry succumb
to the dragoons, the fresh 3rd Squadron, Gens d'Armes
attacks the already victorious 1st Dragoon Squadron.

Electoral musketry exacts vengeance upon 3rd Sqn, 
Kornstartsch Curassiers.

Gunfire and musketry across the river...

I rather think that it ought to be permissible in a square gris battlefield, that units face the square corners when it is sensible to do so. Of course that does not affect musketry or gunnery ranges, nor arc of fire. Not that it matters a whole lot...

... smashes the Fusilier 3rd Company.

Facing double their numbers, the Gens d'Armes 
survivors scatter in rout.

The end of the action. Electoral losses have been 
such as to cause the whole command to dissolve in 
rout. 

Generalmarschall von Kornstartsch ordered no pursuit. For the time being he was content to consolidate a bridgehead and await the arrival of the Imperial main army.

This is the first time I have seen the Imperial Army win this action. It might have been a different story had Charlot Soubise had acted true to form, and adopted a defensive stance. Bit, perhaps with something to prove, he rather took the fight to the enemy, who, with Kornstartsch in command, were more than willing to take up the challenge.

The figures in this action were the Warlord(?) 28mm plastic figures for the War of the Spanish succession. I find myself in a little bit of a quandary, because I painted up large units for the Imperialists, but have only a limited number of enemies, still on the sprue. That is one project very much in limbo at the moment!




10 comments:

  1. Grand looking classic battle. Like most everyone of a certain age I have fought this numerous times under different rules sets. Very inspirational.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. It's one of those scenarios - like the Battle of Sittangbad - that one has to try out at least once. Speaking of Sittangbad, I tried that out as a WW2 (Western Desert) action, once. Worked a treat!
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete
  2. Lovely report 👍🏼. Good to see the PW in use for horse and musket ✔️

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Martin -
      PW works very well with Horse and Musket, although I rarely use my square-grid table for it. But I wanted a 'small' battlefield for this scenario.
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete
  3. Good looking game. Good to see the .classic scenes re-created. Charge! is a favorite game .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. parcerni -
      I'll probably 'do' another Sittangbad some time, but probably with my 'War of the Imperial Succession' (c.7YW) figures, and on my hex-grid table.

      These WSS figures are very nice, but right now, I don't really know what to do with them!
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete
  4. Nicely done Ion.
    I have some Spencer Smith figures for exactly this sort of thing - more imagi-nations rather than real world units. Nordic Union (mostly Swedes in blue and yellow) vs Imperialist German/Austrian (in red, white and black).Sadly, whilst the infantry are at full strength, I still need to recruit a few more artillery and cavalry - which is difficult since the SS moulds went to the USA.
    Cheers,
    Geoff

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Geoff -
      I like the sound of your Imagi-Nations - a little bit like my Severeia (vaguely Swedish) and Austereia (vaguely Austrian/Catholic League), but they're 30YW. Are Spencer-Smiths available at all? Or, the supplier having lit up in the US, have they become prohibitively pricey? Are there alternatives reasonably compatible?

      My Napoleonics unfortunately ran into problems of supply, and so, although they are mostly Minifigs, there are a lot of other types, including one army (Prussian) almost entirely OO-scale plastics, apart from the artillery and two (rather unnecessary) Minifigs cavalry units. Elements of that army featured in my 'Battle of Montereau' early in 2024. My French and Prussian armies have FAR too much cavalry!

      Except in the occasional picture, the size differences are barely apparent; during the game, one hardly notices it at all.

      But I have to admit, I would much rather all the figures of an army be from the same manufacturer. I don't think any of my armies satisfy that criterion!
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete
    2. Wee Wolf Miniatures don’t have the Spencer Smith 18th century figures listed on their website but, whenever I ask, they do say they intend to bring them back into production soon. Effectively all I can do is either #1 hope some turn up on eBay (not very often - but if they do they are invariably expensive) or #2 wait till Wee Wolf eventually get around to releasing them.

      Delete
    3. Patience was never my long suit. But, like a lot of my projects, from a position of having not a clue what I'm doing, I find myself upon completion knowing enough to make a start! I could have 'got away' with much smaller Napoleonic armies, and all my favourite figures.
      Let's hope that events come round your way and the Spencer-Smiths become available in numbers.
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete