For their part, the Imperialists still had 7 dice - no units destroyed yet, and all their commanders still issuing orders, but their roll of 22 halved to just 11 units moving. Still having to cope with the Saxons, and Baner's cavalry on the other wing, The Imperialists were finding the situation in the centre becoming critical.
As the wings were closely engaged - the fighting close combats, once begun, continue until one side or both break off with a 'retreat' outcome - The Imperialist begin a counter-drive in the centre. One tercio becoming depleted - down to 1SP only - two others come in from their left flank. One Swedish brigade having involved itself in the fighting on Baner's front has left a gap the Imperialist foot can exploit.

In a surprisingly short time, the Imperialist foot have gone far to straighten out the line of battle, although their line is receding slightly on the Saxon front.
By now, Gottfried Pappenheim's wing is looking very tired: 15 strength points (SP) remaining from the original 24, though all units are still in action. But the opposing Swedish wing is looking even more threadbare: just four cavalry units and a commanded musketeer - 13SPs - still in the fight. A brigade caught up in the fight gets hit in flank by Imperialist heavy horse.
Another brigade, in a deadly fight against an equally depleted tercio is attacked in flank also, and has become practically surrounded. Losses mounting on both sides.
Despite early losses, the Saxons are putting up a tremendous fight, refusing to go back for anyone. Going third this turn, their pitiful roll of 4 on 2D6 translates to the two units on the green die pictured. Not a lot of movement, but they don't need more. One close combat continuing, the other two front line units engage in a firefight with the Imperialist horse. The Imperialists are outnumbered but holding their own.
This time the Saxons go first! But their 2D6 roll is even worse, translating to just one unit doing much of anything. As the front lines have become separated, this does not redound to the Saxons' benefit!
Meanwhile. looking along the line, one sees that the Imperialists have almost restored their front. One gun battery is still in action. On the Allied side, the tide of brigades has receded somewhat; and Baner's wing is starting to crumble.
On foot, Otto von Schoenburg leads his troops into action against the Swedish foot. The latter's superior firepower is neutralised when the tercios close into a hand-to-hand fight. Perhaps the Imperialists are now in the ascendancy?
But a wisp remains, it seems, of Baner's wing: 12SP lost. Pappenheim's command is in little better shape: 10SP gone out of 24. The brigade sent to help Baner finds itself assailied in front and flank.
Suddenly, Imperialist success on the Saxon front! The lead Saxon tercio collapses, whereat Furstenburg leads a cavalry charge into the rather shaken (1SP remaining) Saxon left flank cavalry unit. This will be awkward for the Saxons, reduced to a single activation die.
Baner's wing is just about ready to collapse, just ragged remains of horse and foot still in the fight.
In this general view, the Imperialist resurgence becomes apparent. Baner just barely holding up his wing, the centre pushed back, and the Saxons in trouble. The Saxons going first activated one unit; the Swedes then activated 11 - still doing fairly well despite losses; and finally the Imperialists doing no more than matching the Swedish roll. But there is no denying, the Imperialists have now the upper hand.
![]() |
Absent my notes, I can't state for certain why I called the battle at this point. Before I began this write-up I could not recall the result. But in examining the pictures for this posting it becomes clear that in fact the battle went quite against history and resulted in an Imperialist success. The Saxons defied history and refused to collapse, and Pappenheim actually wore down Baner's command, though at a high cost. I think it pretty certain that the Swedish Army became exhausted, and were starting to go backwards.
So Graf Tserclaes von Tilly proclaimed a great and glorious victory for the Catholic League. And King Gastaf Adolph? I have an idea that he did not leave the battlefield under his own power...
OK, then. Although it was a pretty gripping action to play out, the constraints of the battlefield compared with the size of the armies obviated the main early envelopment by Pappenheim's wing, and left Furstenburg's wing too narrow a front to deal with the inexperienced Saxons. So, as a refight, not an unqualified success.
Meanwhile, there are plenty of other 30YW battles to fight (Nordlingen!). I am also thinking of doing English Civil War battles, but under the guise of a conflict between the rival nations, the Kingdom of Severeia and the Empire of Austereia. A future 'project' perhaps...
















Great game and well worth the wait for the report!
ReplyDeleteI really like your hex shaped town/villages - very neat.
Maudlin Jack -
DeleteI have made a couple of those hex-based towns, and two square based that will fit inside the hexes with no overlaps. I may do more, with a slightly modified design to accommodate my Chromatic wars infantry stands. But I have a great many buildings, which rather discourages my adding more to the 'housing stock'!
Cheers,
Ion
Outstanding battle report. Very few games I have seen show such high levels of forward then backwards movement. A great success for Tiily even if unable to show the historical battles development. Great looking figures too.
ReplyDeleteWEK 3
DeleteThese 30YW battles with Revell figures have a look I don't get with my other armies. The only non-Revell figures are my 2-stand, 4 figure Croat light horse - actually HaT Mamelukes, which look pretty similar to Croats.
I like games with plenty of movement, but, although the ebb and flow overall was apparent, under this rule set, action is liable to get pretty 'sticky'. That was one of the reasons for my reducing the SP size of the tercios for this action, and doubling the firepower of the Swedish battalia. So it is in the interest of the tercios to close (which eventually they did), and for the battalia/brigades to stand off and shoot. It may take one or two battles more for this 'system' to shake down.
Cheers,
Ion
Another gripping battle report. I can see why you called the action. At that point a Swedish victory seemed to be very unlikely.
ReplyDeleteMark -
DeleteAlmost nothing went 'per spec'. No doubt future historians and historiographers will analyse the shortcomings of the Vasan military system... But it was certainly interesting, and went along at a pretty fair clip.
I think I'll redo this battle, but probably 'bathtub' it more ruthlessly, or grid up my 6'x4' board.
Cheers,
Ion
I enjoyed both parts immensely Ion. Even scaled down this was a massive game with superb looking figures on both sides.
ReplyDeleteBest wishes, James
James -
DeleteThese 30YW games certainly have a 'look'. I think to 'work', though, the battlefield needs to be larger relative to the size of the armies. This is one battle that could stand a re-run, methinks.
Cheers,
Ion
A nail biter with real ebb and flow!
ReplyDeleteI wouldn't worry about disguising the ECW battles; the likes of Charlie Wesencraft used the same figures for ECW and TYW! If it's good enough for them......
Neil
Neil -
DeleteYou know: I read Charlie Wesencraft's book (got from a local library), and noted down all the scenarios. I have the file (paper) stashed away somewhere. I never noticed the 30YW figures! I remember nothing whatever about his rule set, though. I thought highly of the book but, at the time (40-odd years ago), never found a copy to buy. In this part of the world, harder to find mail order sources for books and such. Moved onto other projects.
Cheers,
Ion