During the week long pause in Turcowaz moves, the Trebizond command had not altogether been idle. Having taken the town of Zugdidi, and placed himself between the two Izumrud-Zeleniyan columns, Bashir Ed Din Pasha had created a strategic situation very favourable to Turcowaz, but at the same time his command was vulnerably placed. Much might depend upon what Abdul Abulbul Ameer did next. For his part, though, he was none too willing to attack a corps similar in strength to his own and ensconced among a tangle of hill country beyond the Tekhuri river. His dilatoriness - at least, so said Bashir Ed Din afterwards - did much to compromise the whole campaign.
In the night of 19-20th June, the moon just past full, Count Ignatieff stole a march upon Abdul Ameer, abandoned his camp fires still burning, and marched off to Zugdidi. The same day, the Guards Legion having debarked where the road north met the coast, joined the battered Coastal Column west of the town. General-Leytenant Kutizedoff at once ordered a reconnaissance. Making contact with Kutizedoff's command beyond the town, Ignatieff ordered a reconnaissance of his own a day later. The day after that, 22 June, the Zeleniyans commenced their attack.
Zugdidi Battle Map - from the topographical engineer Major I.M. Poteranskii |
The broad outlines of the position and Izumrud-Zeleniya plan might be gathered from the opening pictures and Igor M. Poteranskii's sketch map. Two of the Turcowaz Divisions, with 3rd Regiment from 1st Division, had fortified the town against attack from east and west. Two regiments of 1st Division, with the machine gun company, fortified a ridge position covering the vital road south. They were supported by field gun battalion positioned close to the road. The cavalry not being suited to defence remained by the south road (it doesn't appear in many of the pictures, but would have served only to cover a retreat).
West side of Zugdidi: the Zeleniyan Coastal Column approaches... |
Turcowaz Trebizond Command:
Commander: Bashir Ed Din Pasha = 6SP
1st Division:
HQ: 1SP
1st Rifle Regiment = 3SP
2nd Rifle Rgt =2SP
3rd Rifle Rgt = 3SP
Total 1st Division = 9SP
Turcowaz: 1st Division and MGs facing east and the Kavkaz Column |
2nd Division:
HQ: 1SP
4th Rifle Rgt = 3SP
5th Rifle Rgt = 3SP
6th Rifle Rgt = 3SP
Total 2nd Division: 10SP
3rd Division:
HQ: 1SP
7th Rifle Rgt = 3SP
8th Rifle Rgt = 4SP
9th Rifle Rgt = 3SP
Total 3rd Division: 11SP
19th Cavalry: 2SP
Artillery/ Support Group:
I,II/1st (Field) Regiment = 3SP (2 Battalions)
III,IV/2nd (Medium) Regiment = 4SP (2 Battalions)
IX Machine-gun Company = 2SP
Total Support group: 9SP
Train: 3 units @ 2SP = 6SP (for want of table space, the trains were left off the table, and their unit and SP counts not included in the totals)
Totals Trebizond command:
19 Units, activations: 9/10/11
47SP, Exhaustion Point -16SP, Rout Point -24SP
Note: Turcowaz had 9SP worth of defence works; 1 fortified redoubt, and 7 other field works.
This brings the SP up to 56.
The attack involved the whole of the Izumrud-Zeleniyan army.
Overall Command: General-Leytenant Kutizedoff = 6SP
Coastal Column:
1st Division:
detached to Kavkaz Column
3rd Division:
HQ: = 1SP
9th Infantry = 2SP
10th Infantry = 3SP
11th Infantry = 2SP
12th Infantry = 3SP
Total 3rd Division: 11SP
Guards Legion:
HQ: Count Ivan Skavinski-Skavar = 1SP
1st Guards (elite) = 4SP
2nd Guards (elite) = 4SP
50th Circassian Rifles (poor) = 4SP
9th Uhlan Light Horse (average) = 3SP
Total Guards Legion: 16SP
Cavalry::
1st Hussars = 2SP
2nd Hussars = 1SP
3rd Hussars = 1SP
4th Hussars = 1SP
Total cavalry: 5SP
Matelot Brigade Group:
Marine Regiment = 4SP
Machine Gun Company = 1SP
Naval Artillery = 1SP
Total Matelot Brigade: 6SP
Artillery:
I, II/1st Field Regiment @ 2SP = 4SP
Train: 5 units @2SP = 10SP (off table, omitted from Unit and SP count)
Kavkaz Column: Count N.P. Ignatieff (3SP)
1st Division (attached from Coastal Column)
HQ: 1SP
1st Grenadiers (elite) = 3SP
2nd Grenadiers (elite) = 2SP
3rd Grenadiers (elite) = 3SP
4th Grenadiers (elite) = 2SP
Total 1st Division: 11SP
2nd Division:
HQ: 1SP
5th Infantry = 2SP
6th Infantry = 3SP
7th Infantry = 2SP
8th Infantry (disbanded)
Total 2nd Division: 8SP
Cavalry:
5th Cossack = 3SP
6th Cossack = 2SP
5th Rifle Rgt = 3SP
6th Rifle Rgt = 3SP
Total 2nd Division: 10SP
Turcowaz: 3rd Division garrisoning Zugdidi; 2nd Division behind earthworks on the far side of the town. |
3rd Division:
HQ: 1SP
7th Rifle Rgt = 3SP
8th Rifle Rgt = 4SP
9th Rifle Rgt = 3SP
Total 3rd Division: 11SP
19th Cavalry: 2SP
Artillery/ Support Group:
I,II/1st (Field) Regiment = 3SP (2 Battalions)
III,IV/2nd (Medium) Regiment = 4SP (2 Battalions)
IX Machine-gun Company = 2SP
Total Support group: 9SP
Train: 3 units @ 2SP = 6SP (for want of table space, the trains were left off the table, and their unit and SP counts not included in the totals)
Totals Trebizond command:
19 Units, activations: 9/10/11
47SP, Exhaustion Point -16SP, Rout Point -24SP
Note: Turcowaz had 9SP worth of defence works; 1 fortified redoubt, and 7 other field works.
This brings the SP up to 56.
Kavkaz Column on its start lines... |
Overall Command: General-Leytenant Kutizedoff = 6SP
Coastal Column:
1st Division:
detached to Kavkaz Column
3rd Division:
HQ: = 1SP
9th Infantry = 2SP
10th Infantry = 3SP
11th Infantry = 2SP
12th Infantry = 3SP
Total 3rd Division: 11SP
Guards Legion:
HQ: Count Ivan Skavinski-Skavar = 1SP
1st Guards (elite) = 4SP
2nd Guards (elite) = 4SP
50th Circassian Rifles (poor) = 4SP
9th Uhlan Light Horse (average) = 3SP
Total Guards Legion: 16SP
Cavalry::
1st Hussars = 2SP
2nd Hussars = 1SP
3rd Hussars = 1SP
4th Hussars = 1SP
Total cavalry: 5SP
Matelot Brigade Group:
Marine Regiment = 4SP
Machine Gun Company = 1SP
Naval Artillery = 1SP
Total Matelot Brigade: 6SP
Artillery:
I, II/1st Field Regiment @ 2SP = 4SP
Train: 5 units @2SP = 10SP (off table, omitted from Unit and SP count)
The Izumrud-Zeleniya Coastal Column. |
Kavkaz Column: Count N.P. Ignatieff (3SP)
1st Division (attached from Coastal Column)
HQ: 1SP
1st Grenadiers (elite) = 3SP
2nd Grenadiers (elite) = 2SP
3rd Grenadiers (elite) = 3SP
4th Grenadiers (elite) = 2SP
Total 1st Division: 11SP
Izumrud-Zeleniya: Grenadiers and Cossacks make ready to attack the fortified ridge line. |
2nd Division:
HQ: 1SP
5th Infantry = 2SP
6th Infantry = 3SP
7th Infantry = 2SP
8th Infantry (disbanded)
Total 2nd Division: 8SP
The depleted 2nd Division threatens the east side of town, defended by 3rd Turcowaz Division |
Cavalry:
5th Cossack = 3SP
6th Cossack = 2SP
7th Cossack = 2SP
8th Cossack = 2SP
Total Cavalry: 9SP
Artillery:
1st Mountain Artillery = 1SP
2nd Mountain Artillery = 2SP
Train: 4 Units @2SP = 8SP (off table; omitted from unit and SP count)
Totals Izumrud-Zeleniya:
36 Units, activations 17/18/19.
82SP, Exhaustion Point -28SP, Rout Point -41SP
Note that all units are 'average' unless otherwise stated.
8th Cossack = 2SP
Total Cavalry: 9SP
Artillery:
1st Mountain Artillery = 1SP
2nd Mountain Artillery = 2SP
Train: 4 Units @2SP = 8SP (off table; omitted from unit and SP count)
Totals Izumrud-Zeleniya:
36 Units, activations 17/18/19.
82SP, Exhaustion Point -28SP, Rout Point -41SP
Note that all units are 'average' unless otherwise stated.
Turcowaz: elements of 2nd and 3rd Divisions supported by the medium artillery regiment. |
This has the makings of a lengthy narrative so I thought I would leave the 'after action report' for the next Kavkaz Campaign posting.
To be continued...
To be continued...
Ion, a big battle! But a tough one for the attackers despite the Guards and the Grenadiers. The defenders of the town though look, like they may find themselves isolated! - quite the situation.
ReplyDeleteNorm -
DeleteI have to admit that this battle was probably too big for this table, which is why one wing had to deploy on the 'gable' end of the board. And it was no easy ride for either side, for all that the result turned out to be decisive.
Cheers,
Ion
Gosh, this is going to be a big fight. Looking forward to the battle report.
ReplyDeleteBit of a big report, too, Martin!
DeleteA nice build up to this big battle and am looking forward to the AAR and the fall out from the action and its impact on the campaign.
ReplyDeleteSteve J -
DeleteHaven't actually figured out what the campaign impact will be. Much may depend upon what cards are drawn for the campaign moves.
Things look like they are going to get messy. The battlefield looks nice Ion - but doubtless things will get bloody as the assault presses ahead. I look forwards to reading the AAR.
ReplyDeleteYour toy soldiers, as ever, look good. Certainly more colourful than, say, plain khaki.
Cheers,
Geoff
Geoff -
DeleteThe battlefield certainly became a little bit tangled as bottlenecks developed!
Cheers,
Ion
And hopefully I’ve just sorted my Google account problems. At least I can now comment with my id, rather than “anonymous”.
DeleteCheers,
Geoff
Looks as if things will get messy very quickly :-)
ReplyDeleteRegards, Chris.
Well... The action developed pretty quickly!
Delete