Thursday, September 25, 2025

More Ship Building

We interrupt the Little Great War narrative with the announcement from the Admiralty that the Ruberian Navy has commissioned 3 more line-of-battle ships, expanding the fleet to three battle squadrons. These are:

  • RMS Centurion

  • RMS Majestic

  • RMS Canopus. I used a different construction method
    for the masts and fighting tops for this one.

The three battle squadrons will now comprise:

Commanding in Chief: Admiral Sir Jno Jellibene

First Battle Squadron - Weatherby Jack, Vice-Admiral of the White 
RMS Thunderer  Devastation
RMS Sans Pareil Victorious
RMS  Admiral Hood  Admiral Hawke (flag)

Second Battle Squadron - Lord Galesforth Mower, Rear-Admiral of the Blue
RMS Royal Sovereign
RMS Centurion
RMS Majestic
(flag)

Second Battle Squadron: Royal Sovereign (leading),
Majestic,
and Centurion


Third Battle Squadron
- Sir Windermere Auger, Vice-Admiral of the Red
RMS Canopus
RMS Commonwealth
(flag)
RMS Agamemnon

There is a chronology to these: 1st Sqn 1870s-1880s; 2nd Sqn early to mid 1890s; 3rd Sqn late 1890s - early 1900s. Second Squadron features side-by-side pairs of funnels; 3rd Sqn fore-and-aft pairs. Third Squadron is slightly more powerful than the 2nd; both much more powerful than the 1st.

There will be added 17th Destroyer Flotilla: S17, R21, R30

Of course, there will have to be a commensurate increase in the establishment of the Azurian Navy.  The Azurian Admiralty is thinking of more powerful units than it already has, something like Suffren and Republique, which might be a match, more or less, with some of the more modern Ruberian vessels. A couple more or so torpedo boats will have to be built, too, of course. So the Azurian navy will comprise 7 battleships, 1 armoured cruiser (a small one), 6 torpedo boats (or possibly 8) and 2 inshore gunboats.

A note on the names of the commanders of the battle squadrons. 
Have you ever heard of Sir Cloudesley Shovell? He served in the Royal Navy from 1663 to 1707, rising from cabin boy  to Admiral of the Fleet. He was killed in a shipwreck.
His is a name to conjure with, hence the names of my Ruberian admirals.
 
A couple of ship captains also enter my Ruberian dramatis personae navalis:
Captain Horatio Trumpeter - Protected cruiser Endymion Eurybia
Captain Richard Trevanion - Armoured cruiser Warrior

* * *

Meanwhile - the narrative of the Norromandy Beach Landing - Operation Archduke - is taking rather longer to get itself written. The pics have been uploaded, and one of them labelled; and the landing map also done. It remains to write up the D-Day action.


21 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. Cheers, Neil. I quite like these new additions myself! If one isn't too fussy about accuracy, these things really are fun to make.

      Delete
  2. Replies
    1. Geordie -
      Until a few years ago, I looked upon the pre-dreadnought era with a certain disdain. But I always liked the look of Steampunk. How was I to know then that warship design from 1860-1905 was the epitome of Steampunk? The French in particular embraced to visual concept, even before the term 'Steampunk' became a 'thing'.

      I did toy with making for the Ruberian navy a RMS Dreadnought, but that class of warship was simply too big properly to 'fit' my system.
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete
    2. It works for me .. looks fun .. is creative and imaginative .. and is the bedding are for other ideas. Perfect example of hobbyist creativity. Carry on mate!

      Delete
  3. I love your ship builds! Good to see the shipyards hard at work repairing and replacing the losses from your recent epic naval battle. 😁👍

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mark -
      Indeed, I'll have to come up with a narrative to explain the provenance of these new vessels. But it does mean that Azuria will have - once the new vessels are built - a competitive fleet in the Mesogesean Sea, and something more than a 'fleet in being' in the Western Ocean.
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete
  4. Nice to see a mid-construction pic of your battleships.
    I'm looking forward to reading about the invasion 👍

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maudlin Jack -
      That landing battle was pretty fraught and all! I took a few pics of the construction process of 'Centurion'. I'm thinking of working that up to an article, though it will probably fall short of an actual tutorial.
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete
  5. Wonderful looking ship. It must be great fun making these ships.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Peter -
      I'm not as a rule all that fond of model making, such as I do make being intended for war games action. But these 'balsa and bits' ship building projects are fun, and reasonably quick to make. My 'Chubby Marine' inventory is becoming fairly sizeable. I thought I had drawn a line under it, but, no ...

      I'm starting to wonder if maybe the Kaiser of Grauheim might be starting to feel the itch to own a navy...
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete
  6. They are great models. I'm not sure I would have the patience to design and build them from scratch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Martin -
      You do raise the vexed question of 'design'. That has been problematic - trying to interpret (with any kind of correctitude) photographs, pictures and plans I find irritatingly difficult. Of course, the 'Chubby' design imposes its own creative constraints.

      When building 'Radetzky' (the Austrian pre-dreadnought that I placed in the navy of the Czar of Izumrud-Zeleniya), I took quite a good plan picture, and squashed it lengthways to the scales I was looking for (1:1200 length; 1:600 beam). The shape provided a very good template for the hull, but the superstructure, turrets and guns looked all squashed. In the construction I just went by 'eye' to obtain an acceptable 'look' of the thing.

      My methods are ever changing - another reason why I find I can't really put together a 'tutorial' as such, but just a general idea of the construction process.
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete
  7. As your naval program increases the size and scope of the fleets, the models look very cool. Truly reflects an eye to the effect you want. Looking forward to the next few games you have to report on.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. pancerni -
      The last three battleships do look fairly dramatic, I think, and have the 'right' sort of look. Nine battleships will be sufficient for the Ruberian navy. I have now 4 more torpedo boats a-building (almost complete) for the Azurian; 2 battleships (to add to the five already made) have been selected but not yet built for the same navy.
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete
  8. Archduke Piccolo,

    Yet more wonderful models for your fleets! If I wasn’t up to my eyes with work on my WW2 20mm collection, I suspect that I would also be building similar model ships for my Belle Epoque project.

    All the best,

    Bob

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob -
      Thank you for kind comment. Maybe your own ship-building programme will follow in due course, but of course, Operation Barbarossa deserves to take priority! Having said that, one feels that HMS Victoria would lie well in a battle line.
      I have to admit, I have become very fond of my 'Chubby Marine' navies!
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete
  9. Nice looking ships Ion. I believe that if it looks right, then it’s right enough.
    Cheers,
    Geoff

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Geoff -
      It it looks like what it's meant to be, then that is what it is. I reckon they'll do. This last batch really look battlewagonish (I think), and I daresay that the two big Azurian battleships I have in mind will offer a Gallic steampunk appearance to their navies!
      Cheers,
      Ion

      Delete
  10. Beautiful additions Ion. Superb as always.
    Best wishes, James

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cheers, James -
      This naval project seems to have taken over my war gaming life, lately!
      Regards,
      Ion

      Delete