The Bluvian II Division at Cerulean City. The significance of the RED Strength point marker will be explained in due course... |
The Shambattle map. The names of half the towns have been renamed. |
In this action I made slight changes to the Order of battle I outlined in a previous posting (Shambattle Maps). For both armies I reduced the infantry from 14 to 12 stands (each representing a battalion), but increased the artillery to 2 field and 1 medium battery. I also added an engineer battalion at 3 Strength points, plus a train of another 3SP. As it happens, one of those trains contributed materially to the action.
The infantry formed 3 Divisions of 4 Battalions, plus a machinegun company. The 6 cavalry regiments formed a Division. Again, the likelihood of treachery in the ranks was determined by a series of die rolls, the identity of which was indicated by a 'wrong' coloured strength point marker (die). The time and nature of their perfidy would be determined during the course of the action.
The remainder of this first instalment of the narrative, I'll reserve it to the pictures' captions to lay out the situation...
Scarletton: the Redina capital city. The red brick edifice is the hospital, recruiting centre and logistics collection point. |
The plains before Scarletton. Redina machine guns and artillery cover the Middle Bridge... |
... whilst on the opposite bank of the Purple River, the Bluvian Cavalry await the order to march. |
Redina 3rd Brigade garrison at Redville |
Bluvian 1st (Turco) Brigade massed at Blueford |
A comment on the fords. The original game system has no fords, nor means of crossing the river other than by the bridges. My version, even the smaller 'square-grid' game, being rather enlarged, called for something a little extra, offering more scope than the three bottlenecks. The river in sections, each section was diced for, a '6' revealing the existence of a ford. This action led to fords being discovered in a whole different location from last time - a very unpredictable river, this! These were close by the Blueford Bridge - offering an explanation for the appellation of the nearby town. The small stones indicate the fordable river sections.
I also decided that the engineers, not present in the 'square-grid' game, would accompany a bridging train. Were I to do this again, I would task the invading army with supplying a bridging train; the defenders with laying out a fortified position. Unfortunately, I failed to give the defending army (Redina) a well defined engineering task. Their engineers became little more than just another battalion.
To be continued...
I also decided that the engineers, not present in the 'square-grid' game, would accompany a bridging train. Were I to do this again, I would task the invading army with supplying a bridging train; the defenders with laying out a fortified position. Unfortunately, I failed to give the defending army (Redina) a well defined engineering task. Their engineers became little more than just another battalion.
To be continued...
Including the fords should open the game up a bit - I'm looking forward to the next instalment..
ReplyDeleteMaudlin Jack -
DeleteIt does seem to add to the flow of the game, and gives an invader more strategic scope. Of course, it dopes depend on the dimensions of the battlefield.
Cheers,
Ion
Another epic story begins.
ReplyDeleteWell - plenty of incident anyhow!
DeleteCheers,
Ion
Oh great stuff! I’m looking at doing something similar but a little more simple to fit the time I have, of course it’s straight from Morschauser’s book but the similarities are quite striking to “sham “
ReplyDeleteDemitri -
DeleteAlthough I've not read Jos. Morschauser's book, I gather the thing, like your own concept, was on a more 'epic' scale than the original 'Shambattle'. Even on a sizeable hex-table like mine, Shambattle has the look and feel of something very localised, in a very densely populated country.
Contrast this with something like the battles of my occasional 'Medifluvian Campaign' series, fought on the same hex-table. And yet my 'Shambattle' arena was fought on a front rather broader than that of my 'Surprise Party' WW2 action.
Here are the links for comparison:
https://archdukepiccolo.blogspot.com/2018/09/surprise-party.html
https://archdukepiccolo.blogspot.com/2019/06/from-chronicles-of-rajistan.html
and for something really insane: Operation Uranus...
https://archdukepiccolo.blogspot.com/2017/12/operation-uranus-assault-against-third.html
Very experimental, of course, but a lot of fun!
Cheers,
Ion
Having published the above reply, I remembered something rather simpler that I tried out that was inspired by the Shambattle concept, but it was a bit more elaborate. The thing was designed around a very limited number of figures...
Deletehttps://archdukepiccolo.blogspot.com/2020/12/an-indulgence.html
This one was a whole lot of fun to do.
Cheers,
Ion
Lovely armies Ion, your terrain is impressive 👏👏
ReplyDeleteOn this map I would expect both countries to have a quite decent chance of having already established the locations of any fords.
If one country, however, is invading deep within the territory of another nation then that’s a different matter (I would suggest the “home” team would be almost certain of the exact locations of any fords whereas the invading team would likely have little firm idea and presumably would have to send out scouting parties).
Cheers,
Geoff
Geoff -
DeleteThere being but one major river to cross, that is the only real obstacle or location of potential bottlenecks. I thought, though, that perhaps the river bed changes with annual and seasonal fluctuations of river flow. The process of gouging out the fords downstream led to the settling of sediment and gravel upstream... say. But these could have been determined by reconnaissance in the form of border patrols. So both sides were aware of the location of river fords. But the Bluvians are thinking about something more...
Cheers,
Ion
Archduke Piccolo,
ReplyDeleteI like the idea of using a larger hexed terrain rather than my smaller squared terrain. I also think that including fords and reducing the number of bridges improves the whole set up. I wish that I was well enough to copy your example … and look forward to the time that I am able to.
All the best,
Bob
Bob -
DeleteIf you needed extra motivation... I'll be keeping an eye out for your next battle, whatever and whenever it is!
Actually, I have kept the three bridges, and two of them still present bottlenecks - and that helps make it interesting.
All the best,
Ion
Excellent stuff there Ion! I like the addition of the fords, with them being seasonal and so change positions, which to my mind improves the game and options for both sides:).
ReplyDeleteIt certainly added something to the action around Blueford and Redville, Steve. And the Bluvian bridging train added something as well! Thanks for you comment!
DeleteCheers,
Ion
Very interesting thus far, I expect more unexpected twists and turns before it's all said and done...
ReplyDeleteA very convoluted tale, to be sure, Mark! I've just posted the second instalment; there will be a third.
DeleteCheers,
Ion
Wonderful setup well done Ion on a fabulous game. Warm wishes - Quinn
ReplyDelete