One of the reasons for the Roman Civil War taking so long to play through and write up had to do with other projects I had going. One of them was the Chromatic Wars, so called because the warring nations were named after colours. Long term readers might recall from late 2020, the outbreak of the First Blacklands War, as newly created nations sought to expand their territories at the expense of the Settee Empire, more generally known as Turcowaz (TURQUOISE).
That campaign had a tendency to grow as one of the nations, Hellenica, had built a navy (based upon the Greek), in order to blockade the Empire by sea. A link to the whole narrative may be found at the top of the column to the right.
The nations Chervenia and Rhumbaba have both acquired very small navies since then, in preparation for the Second Blacklands War.
In the last few days I have resumed the ship building programme that is the subject of the following pictures.
'Flatiron' gunboats. Modeled on real ones, but I can't identify them! I lost my notes. |
HMS Victoria - yes, the one carrying Adm. Tryon's flag. Ruberian Navy (RED). |
All these vessels were built in what I call my 'Chubby Marine' style (the appellation a nod towards the Fujimi 'Chibi Maru' models of IJN ships of WW2). The ships (apart form the Flatiron types) are very roughly scaled at 1:1200 in length, and 1:600 in the beam.
HMS Thunderer - Ruberian Navy |
Thunderer comes out as a very small vessel in this scale - just 8cm long. Its sole armament comprises the four early 12" guns; there is no secondary armament.
IZNS Tsarina Ekaterina II - Navy of Izumrud -Zeleniya (GREEN) |
I saw a really nice picture of this vessel and was struck by how elegant it looked. The main guns are barbette mounted. Now, while it is clear that the secondary armament can not shoot across the centre line projection forward or aft, one has to ask, to what extent the main forward guns can. Clearly the secondary armament forward and aft shooting effectiveness must be half the 'broadside'. What about the effectiveness of the main guns firing forward?
Now, HMS Victoria (this vessel will probably receive a different name) had huge16.25" guns in its (fatally) massive gun turret. I gather they were installed in lieu of 13.5" guns that were unavailable at the time of commissioning. So let's for the sake of this article, pretend they are the equivalent of the most powerful ordnance in the 'pre-dreadnought' list: the 'modern' 11 or 12-inch guns.
The gun range is 8 hexes; the standard effect 9D6, reducing by 1 for each hex added to the adjacent for range. At 8 hexes range, the effect is down to 2D6. But the 9D6s go for 4 guns; Victoria has 2 only, firing forward or in broadside. So its effect must be halved: 5D6s, reducing to 1D6 at 8 hexes range.
What about the 'Y' turret at the stern? It houses a single 10-inch gun.
The standard 4-gun shoot has a range of 6 hexes, with 7D6 at 1hex range. As Victoria has but one such gun, it rolls just 2D6 at 1 hex range, reducing to 1D6 at 3 to 6 hexes.
For this vessel, the stern gun I count as a primary. This vessel's secondary 6-inch guns in broadside casemates shoot at the standard rate. Strictly speaking it should be allowed a 50% extra, but I'll stay with the four guns per side of the model, rather than the historical 6. These guns fire abeam only.
Work in progress: HMS Royal Sovereign (RED) |
I admit to taking considerable licence with this ship. Of the eight Royal Sovereigns built, only one, HMS Hood, had turreted main guns. At that, those turrets were cake-tin shaped, rather than the shape I gave them here. The secondary turrets - far more substantial that the barbette emplacements - have been placed slightly nearer the ends of the vessel. Begun today, it now awaits its paint work.
4x13.5" main guns; 10x6" secondaries. |
I will have to add in 'Modern' 13.5" guns to the pre-dreadnought ordnance list, for the vessels of my fleet that carry them. This will make Royal Sovereign a very powerful vessel, the main guns reaching out to 10 hexes. An alternative (quite an arbitrary one) is to go with the stats for the 'modern' 12" guns listed in the Portable Dreadnought game. The extra 3 dice at all ranges in broadside would be bad enough at the incoming end...
More pics of the whole group...
Fun models Ion - I like these gunboats, bristling with guns and looking like they mean business
ReplyDeleteMaudlin Jack -
DeleteThese things are quite fun - and quick - to make, if one is not too fussy about historical accuracy. My rule: if it looks like what it's meant to be, then that is what it is.
Cheers,
Ion
Archduke Piccolo,
ReplyDeleteI love your ship models … and the latest ones are outstanding and very inspiring to other wargame ship modellers.
Your flatiron gunboats look very similar to the design of the French armoured gunboats of the Acheron-class (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ach%C3%A9ron_class_gunboat_-_Brassey%2527s_1887.png). They were designed to be coastal defence vessels.
All the best,
Bob
Thanks Bob -
DeleteI do like my versions of the Russian ship, and the 'Royal Sovereign. I plan to build the Austrian ship 'Radetzky', which will go to the Izumrud-Zeleniya Navy.
The Acheron class does seem to be the inspiration for my gunboats. I recall making them because I liked the look. Seems I was mistaken about their provenance, though. I thought they were British, or possibly American.
Well, since they were French, they will have to go into the Azurian Navy! They are overscale, of course - about twice the length they would have been had I gone with my usual scaling conventions. I gather they were armed with a single 10.8-inch main gun, and a couple of 3.9-inch on each side (under the top deck amidships).
Cheers,
Ion
I must admit I love your stylised ships, they look great and really good fun, great work.
ReplyDeleteDonnie -
DeleteThank you! The designs make a good compromise of 'presence' that can be used in a limited battle area. Only problem: storage space...
Cheers,
Ion
Your ships are lovely. A touch cartoon-ish (but in a nice way). If I was the enemy Admiral I wouldn’t want to mess with ‘em. Well done Ion ๐๐
ReplyDeleteCheers,
Geoff
Geoff -
DeleteI used to call my designs 'cartooned'. I started making them before I discovered that the cartooned 'Chibi Maru' style was a thing in Japan. Great looking modelling kits. Very tempted to get some, but, last I looked Fujimi made only Japanese vessels. These are 4" long, but I gather there is another firm (I think Chinese) that does a wider variety. Unfortunately they are 8", and not really compatible.
Cheers,
Ion
A great looking fleet, you must have had fun scratch building these ships.
ReplyDeletePeter -
DeleteThey have the virtue of being very quick to make, without being in a hurry. I could go for greater accuracy and precision in their construction, but I'm generally pleased with the results. I have 3 more battleships to 'do' for the Ruberian navy, plus one or maybe two cruisers. I've finished two TB-destroyers; they'll get a couple or so more.
Then will come the Azurian navy. Now, they will be tricky, I think.
Cheers,
Ion
I like your ship models alot. Sounds like this will be another interesting campaign.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Mark -
DeleteThis is a pretty big project - a kind of World War One but with just 4 belligerents, of which Germany (Grauheim) isn't one. It will be Ruberia versus Azuria, and Izumrud-Zeleniya vs Turcowaz, but I haven't yet worked out the alignments. Most likely, the 'Blues' will be allied.
As with the Blacklands War, the main action will be on land. The armies Ruberian army is twice the size of the Turcowaz, and slightly larger than the Azurian. But they have... commitments...
I rather think my responses to the comments here could be worked up into a substantive posting!
Cheers,
Ion
Loving your ships, Ion.
ReplyDeleteTranspires my wife's great grandfather was on the design team for the Royal Sovereign class. We have a water colour of the ship proudly on display in the sitting room.
Regards,
Andrew.
Cheers, Andrew -
DeleteI hope that you will forgive the liberties I have taken with the original 'Royal Sovereign' design in constructing my own version!
There is a dramatic beauty in especially the late pre-dreadnought battleships that I have only in recent years begun to appreciate. The naval architecture had their design faults but the 'look', for a war gamer, that is the thing!
Cheers,
Ion
A really fun fleet concept that has created a good number of designs. Looking forward to the battles generated.
ReplyDeletepancerni
DeleteThe proliferation of designs in the 'pre-dreadnought phase' of battleship development makes it hard to produce 'classes', although they do provide one with a reserve of names against sinkings.
If you like the look of these, and you haven't seen it already, you might be interested in this account...
http://archdukepiccolo.blogspot.com/2020/12/first-blacklands-war-war-at-sea-battle.html
Cheers,
Ion
Fun looking little fleet. Looking forward to seeing these in action in your campaign which are always a great read.
ReplyDeleteWEK 3
DeleteThe rule set I use for the battles is a version of the Bob Cordery Portable Naval pre-dreadnought rule set. I keep the fleets limited, of course. The mighty Ruberian navy, the biggest of them all, is projected to comprise 6 battleships, 2 cruisers and 4-6 TB-destroyers. I reckon that's enough for a 'Jutland'!
I have fought a few battles with my Turcowaz and Hellenic fleets - based upon the Turkish and Greek in the Balkan Wars of 1912-3. Both have 8 vessels of various sizes. The Turcowaz have performed better than the Turks did! There were four naval battles in the First Blacklands War, two of which were fleet actions.
They are fun battles, and the ships - the 'cartooned' style - have a certain 'presence' that I find engaging.
Thanks for your comment,
Ion