For the first time in a long, long time, Jacko and I visited the club of which, as fully paid up members, we all too rarely avail ourselves. He brought along his WW2 Romanians and Italians; I brought some Russians, a little bit of terrain, and my metre-square 'grass' mat that I originally bought to make hills from, then changed my mind about its purpose.
On this we played several One Hour Wargames scenarios. I don't recall the names of all the scenarios, unfortunately. The first had the Axis forces (a mixed Romanian/Italian battlegroup) defending a river line, crossable only at the bridge and a ford close by a forest. Half the Russian forces began off table, arriving after several turns behind the Axis left flank.
To tot up losses of strength points, each unit having 15 to begin with, we colour-coded the dice in the holder. The blue dice represented 11-15SP, the purple dice 6-10SP, the red dice 1-5SP. As you might see from the pics, the Russians forcing the river crossing got rather badly knocked about.
The Axis were split in two, some units striving to reach the bridge, the last skulking in a wood whence they were eventually winkled out.
The second action was 'The Bottleneck'. I had the defenders in this one, and frankly I made a pig's breakfast of the defence. The Russians comprised 3 infantry units and an AT gun (you might call them 3 infantry companies and an anti-tank gun company) to defend a point along the road that passed between a forest and a lake, or mere. Beyond the lake was a stretch of open country an attack might choose as an alternate approach.
Unfortunately Colonel N.O. Tverybrightski placed a company in ambush too far forward, out of support from their comrades in rear of the lake. By the time they fetched up where I should have placed them in the ... erm ... first place, they were down to 4SP remaining. Meanwhile, the Axis got pretty much their ideal composition for this operation: 3 rifle companies, a tank company (M13/40, I think), and two batteries of mortars. The mortars were the killers, once the Axis forces got close enough to call down the support fire. I suppose I ought to have been thankful to have got an anti-tank gun, but I don't recall that I got the better of the gunnery duel. This one was an emphatic Axis victory.
On to the next scenario: 'Blundering Relief' - a kind of antithesis of Don Featherstone's famous 'Auberoche' scenario. The Russians are advancing upon an axis-held town. As in the previous scenario, the Russians had just 4 units: 3 rifle companies with mortars in support. The town's garrison comprised one company of Romanians, with a second company off to their right flank.
To the dismay of the Russians, they found the ridge skyline to their left swarming with Italians: tanks, rifle companies and anti-tank guns. It was probably fortunate they had no mortars. But in this scenario, Colonello Giovanni da Clotta elected to send one company at a time onto the flank of the Russian advance. Perhaps this was less a predilection for piecemeal, penny-packet attacks as an excess of caution. Be it noted though: this was a condition imposed upon the role played by the Axis forces. Without it, we really would have had, potentially, a Russian front Auberoche.
The relief forces led off with the tank, and here, I think might have been the game decider. We simply forgot to take the -2 for infantry and mortars shooting at the tank, though we did remember the +2 the tank got against rifle units. Eventually the Russians saw off the tank, and attacked the town with enough strength to take the place. But that victory was undeserved. The tank ought to have been an approximate match for mortar and rifle company together, which might well have left the Italians enough strength, if the town were lost, to recover the place betimes. This one we'll have to do again some time.
The final action, according to my gallery of pictures, was this one: an Axis column intending to barge past or through a small Soviet blocking force, when suddenly a second Soviet force appears on the flank of the column. The column comprised a tank company in the lead, followed by two Italian rifle companies, and anti-tank battery and two Romanian rifle companies bringing up the rear.
A Soviet anti-tank gun and rifle company stood blocking the road: 'но пасара́н!' Making their stage left appearance were three rifle companies backed up by mortars.
Probably the Russians had the ideal forces on this occasion. Part of the column had to be diverted to hold off the flank attack, and part to deal with the road block.
The axis forces never quite made it. Again, possession of the only mortar conferred a significant advantage. Possibly had the Axis forces gone all out to defeat the flank attack before turning their attention to the road block, they might have achieved a breakthrough. ...Maybe.
Well done for getting through four games in one session, the most we've ever managed is two!ReplyDelete
I was also thinking of the lower level units being companies instead of platoons as the rules suggest, and I do wonder if mortars are overpowered. A pair of them seems to be a guaranteed win.
The games went very quickly. I doubt any of them lasted more than half an hour. The two mortars, assisted by my incompetent defence, sure were a game breaker. Even so, I ought to have thought more about how to use the resources I had more effectively in defence. But defence was never my long suit.Delete
An interesting set of games which look like they were a lot of fun to play.ReplyDelete
They are a bit 'beer and pretzel'-ish, but, yes, quite fun. As one rolls for the composition of one's forces, which gives (for WW2) a selection of rifle-armed infantry, mortars (or infantry guns), anti-tank guns and tanks, a given scenario may be played several times and play in different ways.Delete
The other benefit of 'One Hour Wargames' is that you don't need much kit. Or space. So if you're budgetarily pushed, for any WW2 'army' you can get away with 4 rifle groups/ stands, 2 mortars, 2 Anti-tank guns and 2 tanks.
You will see that Paul brought along a mixed group of Italians and Romanians for the Axis side. He had one tank for each: M13 and Pz38(t). I never got to use my T34s...
Yes, you can get away with not using much stuff, although I prefer to do the tank units with two (or even three!) models so they look more scary.Delete
For higher level battles, the Machine Age rules work very well, and that is what I've based my WW2 and Spanish Civil War variants on.
We must look into that, Martin. Hadn't thought of that idea. Neither Paul not I are really investigated the 'Machine Age' chapter.Delete